Legal Opinion

Koerner v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 14, 1929No. 12,252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

This is an action in trover to recover damages for the conversion of certain personal property. The defendant in error will hereafter be referred to -as plaintiff and the plaintiffs in error, as defendants. The defendant Koer ner was the sheriff of Fremont county and, at the request of defendant Chilino, levied npon and sold certain apples and apple boxes as the property of one B. A. Wilson, the father of Elwood A. Wilson, the plaintiff herein. Upon trial a verdict for $615.97 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants. Thereafter motion for a new trial was denied and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tucker v. ParksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. De Votie v. McGerrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Smock v. SmockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Seeleman v. HoaglandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. Arthur v. GardColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buchhalter v. MyersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Fruin v. Gorden (In Re Gorden)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Stephens v. Colorado Division of WildlifeColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API