Schwall v. Quitman Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Worth superior court — Judge Cox. December 9, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodwortH, J.
1. When read in the light of the entire charge and considered in connection with the evidence, there was no error harmful to the defendant in the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made.'
2. Where remarks are made in the hearing of the jurors by the judge during the trial of the case, which counsel insists were of such a character as to prejudice the minds of the jurors hearing them against the cause of their client, a motion should be made to have a mistrial declared, and upon the judge’s refusal to grant such a motion his ruling would be subject to review. Counsel, having failed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Stapleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Wilcox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Saxon v. TolandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Milledge v. BoyettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Tanksley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Farrar v. Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965