Legal Opinion

Tanksley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1926No. 17017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. This case is not dependent wholly- on circumstantial evidence, and, in the absence of a timely and proper written request therefor, the court did not err in failing to instruct the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence. McRae v. State, 27 Ga. App. 614 (2) (109 S. E. 688).

2. Where during the trial of a case an oral request is made that the judge give in charge to the jury the law of circumstantial evidence, and in reply to the request the judge uses language which counsel for the defendant considers prejudicial to the cause of his client and which he insists “amounts to an expression…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Barnett v. StrainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. McRae v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Schwall v. Quitman Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Sorrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodwyne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Spivey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Georgia Utilities Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Farrar v. Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API