Legal Opinion

Milledge v. Boyett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1960No. 38414PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

1. An assignment of error in an amended motion for a new trial on the overruling of a general objection to the admission of evidence which does not set forth the grounds of objection is not sufficient to present a question for review. Howard Supply Co. v. Bunn, 127 Ga. 663 (56 S. E. 757); Whitehead v. State, 101 Ga. App. 524 (114 S. E. 2d 379). Therefore, special ground 5 is without merit. See Stonecypher v. Elliott, 181 Ga. 438 (182 S. E. 587). Likewise, special ground 6 of the motion does not raise a question for determination, because no proper objection appears in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Eddleman v. AskewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Whitten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Pelham Manufacturing Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. King v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Carter v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Perry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Nelson v. CheekCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Farrar v. Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API