Legal Opinion

Van Steenhuyse v. UBS Fin. Servs., Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 5, 2018No. Case No. 18–cv–02041–YGRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2. failure to pay sales commissions when "reasonably calculable," in violation of § 204;

3. failure to pay overtime, in violation of §§ 558 and 1194;

4. failure to provide meal and rest breaks, in violation of § 512;

5. failure to furnish complete and accurate wage statements, in violation of § 226;

6. failure to pay terminated or quitting employees their final paychecks within the deadlines set forth in §§ 201-202, or pay waiting time penalties as required by § 203; and

7. a requirement that employees sign documents containing illegal class and representative action waivers, in violation of §…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bannon v. Anaergia Services LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  2. Becerra-Zamora v. Gruma CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  3. Brent Hesselink v. American Family Life Assurance Company of ColumbusDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  4. Chamberlain v. Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Cuenca v. Quest Service Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API