Legal Opinion
Becerra-Zamora v. Gruma Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 8, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01076Unknown
1Opinion
1 ` 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YESICA BECERRA-ZAMORA, Case No. 24-cv-01076-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. REMAND; DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE; DEFERRING 10 GRUMA CORPORATION, et al., MOTION TO COMPEL 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 15, 26 12 13 Plaintiff Yesica Becerra-Zamora (“Becerra”) moves to remand this PAGA action to state 14 court. Because defendants have failed to show that more than $75,000 is in controversy, the 15 motion to remand is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion to consolidate this case to the lower- 16 numbered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Blanca Argelia Arias v. Residence Inn by MarriottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Urbino v. Orkin Servs. of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Patrick Lacross v. Knight Transportation IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.