Legal Opinion
Meredith v. Fitzgerald
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 22, 1954No. 1434PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellees, hereafter called sellers, were trustees under a second deed of trust on certain real estate, and by virtue of such deed of trust advertised the property for sale, subject to the first deed of trust. Appellant, hereafter called the purchaser, was the successful bidder at the sale and made a deposit of $500. This suit was brought by the purchaser for the return of the deposit. The trial court, after full hearing, sua, sponte dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction. The purchaser has appealed.
We are first met with the sellers’ contention that the appeal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mindell v. GlennDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Moncure v. CurryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Bradford v. CastiglioniDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Barbour v. BaltzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Levene v. OliverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Meredith v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955