Legal Opinion

Joyce v. Vemulapalli

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1992No. Docket 115698PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right an adverse judgment in this action for breach of a contract for the sale of land. Following a bench trial, the trial court ruled that although plaintiffs were not entitled to specific performance of the contract, they were entitled to $9,000 in damages for defendant’s breach. We affirm.

Defendant owned property in Farmington Hills, Michigan. The title to the property was in his name only when he bought the property on a land contract. At the time of purchase, defendant was not married, but he married sometime thereafter. Defendant then mortgaged the property, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. MAX BROOCK, INC. v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Fields v. KornMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Pittsburgh Tube Co. v. Tri-Bend, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Auto Club Insurance v. Frederick & Herrud, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Tucker v. Clare Bros. Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Orion Township v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Tucker v. Clare Bros. Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API