Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Tube Co. v. Tri-Bend, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1990No. Docket 114620PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holbrook, Jr., J.

Plaintiff was ordered to pay third-party plaintiffs $9,084.47 after the Jackson Circuit Court found that the third-party plaintiffs possessed a perfected security interest in the assets of defendant Tri-Bend, Inc. Plaintiff appeals as of right, claiming that the third-party plaintiffs did not have a valid security interest under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code and that the conveyance of the security interest was invalid under the Business Corporation Act, MCL 450.1101 et seq.; MSA 21.200(101) et seq., and the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act, MCL 566.11 et seq.; MSA…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richards v. PierceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Ledbetter v. Brown City Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Allied Supermarkets, Inc. v. Grocer's Dairy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Allied Supermarkets, Inc. v. GROCER'S DAIRY. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of Highland Park v. Grant-Mackenzie Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 718 Arch Street Associates, Ltd. v. Blatstein (In Re Blatstein)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Wells v. Sleep (In Re Michigan MacHine Tool Control Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. Herald Co. v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Joyce v. VemulapalliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Badalament, Inc. v. Mel-O-Ripe Banana Brands, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API