Legal Opinion

Vigil v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1923No. 2652PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

BRATTON, J.

(after stating the facts as above.) Appellant contends that the court erred in overruling its demurrer to the evidence as well as its motion for a directed verdict. This is predicated upon the contention that there is no evidence of actionable negligence on the part of the agents and servants of appellant in the operation of the train in question. It is asserted in this connection that the doctrine of last clear chance or the discovered peril rule, constituting an exception to the right of a plaintiff, who is guilty of contributory negligence to recover…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Guse v. Power & Mining Machinery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Pullman Co. v. FinleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dunleavy v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Crocker v. JohnstonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Lujan v. ReedNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. PachecoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API