Crees v. Chiles
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HAYDEN, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the ruling of the district court granting summary judgment for defendant Richard L. Heideman on the ground he was the alter ego of the corporation which employed plaintiff Barry A. Crees, and thus was immune from suit under Iowa Code section 85.20(2). Plaintiffs claim the trial court erred as a matter of law in finding Heideman was the alter ego of the corporate employer and therefore not subject to the court’s jurisdiction under section 85.20(2). We reverse and remand for trial.
Plaintiff Barry A. Crees was employed by Heideman Drywall, Inc. Defendant Richard…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Barnes v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Neal v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- In Re Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Pappas v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gunderson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Gunderson v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Charles C. Mullen and Julie L. Mullen, Administrators of the Brandon Mullen Estate v. Steven GrettenbergCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
- Gunderson v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Gunderson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.