Legal Opinion

Gunderson v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 6, 2001No. C7-00-999Published

1Opinion of the Court

632 N.W.2d 695 (2001)

Corliss H. GUNDERSON, Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

Mark J. HARRINGTON, Respondent.

No. C7-00-999.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 6, 2001.

Rehearing Denied October 9, 2001.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

Appellant Corliss Gunderson was employed as a receptionist by Harrington Orthodontics, a closely held corporation owned by respondent Dr. Mark Harrington (Harrington), an orthodontist. Gunderson resigned in July of 1998 and brought a civil action against Harrington alleging assault, battery, intentional infliction of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API