Legal Opinion

Gunderson v. Harrington

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 2000No. C7-00-999Published

1Opinion of the Court

619 N.W.2d 760 (2000)

Corliss H. GUNDERSON, Appellant,

v.

Mark J. HARRINGTON, Respondent.

No. C7-00-999.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 21, 2000.

Joseph M. Sokolowski, Kevin R. Coan, Parsinen, Klaplan, Rosberg & Gotlieb, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Jeffrey J. Lindquist, Pustorino, Tilton & Parrington, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, Presiding Judge, HARTEN, Judge, and ANDERSON, Judge.

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant sued respondent, her former employer, alleging assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API