Clark v. Badgley
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The bill is to recover down money on a contract made by defendants to sell their property to complainants. The ground of recovery is that the title was unmarketable in this respect: There was of record a judgment against one of the defendants. Within four months after the recovery of the judgment he had been petitioned in bankruptcy but not discharged at the time the contract was to be performed. Time was of the essence of the contract. The property was acquired after the bankruptcy proceedings. The complainants insist that the judgment was a lien and that a discharge in bankruptcy was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Kobrin v. DrazinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Goldstein v. EhrlickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Smith v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reilly v. GriffithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Richeimer v. FischbeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Richeimer v. FischbeinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930