Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Feyenord
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided October 1, 2004No. 02-P-1260PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcHugh, J.
After a State police officer noticed an inoperable headlight on the car driven by the defendant, Kenton Feyenord, the officer stopped the car. Soon after the stop, the officer found 169 grams of cocaine concealed in the trunk. Before his trial on resulting charges of trafficking in cocaine (G. L. c. 94C, § 32E[b][3]), the defendant, invoking both the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and art. 14 of the *201Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, filed a motion to suppress all physical evidence taken from the vehicle and all statements made to the officer prior to the search.1…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. FeyenordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Commonwealth v. SantosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.