Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Spann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1915No. 7274PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Dallas County Court; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge. Action by Jack Goldman and others against James W. Spann and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

On May 29, 1913, J. M. Camuti, of Dallas county, Tex., executed, acknowledged, and delivered to J. W. Spann an instrument in writing, whereby he conveyed to said Spann, in trust, a stock of groceries, together with all accounts due Camuti, all store fixtures, counters, desks, etc. Spann was vested with possession and given authority to sell the property so conveyed as his judgment dictated, and to apply the proceeds first to the payment in full of $50 attorneys’ fees to Jones, Jones & Spann; a sum equal to 10 per cent, of the whole amount realized from the sale of the property to J. W. Spann,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Watterman, Star & Co. v. SilberbergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Tittle v. VanleerTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Schneider & Davis v. McCoulskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southwestern Drug Corp. v. ChilnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API