Legal Opinion

Watterman, Star & Co. v. Silberberg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1886No. 2033PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Red River. Tried below before the Hon D. H. Scott.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

It appears that Sam Marks, on October 27, 1885, was indebted to a large number of persons, and that George Silberberg was security for the most of this indebtedness. On that day Marks executed an instrument which acknowledged his indebtedness to several persons and firms, who held debts for which Silberberg was security, whereby he declared that he sold and conveyed a stock of goods, accurately described, to Silberberg.

*102The instrument empowered Silberberg to sell the goods and to apply the proceeds to the payment of enumerated debts, one due to Silberberg and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HarbyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Stiles v. Hill, Fontaine & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Davis & Co. v. GibbonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hargadine v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Johnson v. J. M. Robinson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Reagan v. AikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API