Legal Opinion

Schneider & Davis v. McCoulsky

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1894No. 216PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.

The following statement is substantially correct: This suit was brought against appellants to recover the value of a certain stock of shelf goods, groceries, merchandise, etc.; also show cases, fixtures, and other effects. Appellee’s cause of action was based on an alleged wrongful seizure under a writ of attachment issued out of the District Court of Rockwall County, Texas, on December 29, 1891, in a suit in which appellants were plaintiffs and one R. C. Garner defendant.

Appellee claimed the goods so seized and converted by appellants as trustee in a chattel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gunter v. Texas Land and Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Johnson v. J. M. Robinson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Watterman, Star & Co. v. SilberbergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hudson v. C. Eisenmayer, Sr. Milling & Elevator Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Goldman v. SpannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API