Schneider & Davis v. McCoulsky
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.
The following statement is substantially correct: This suit was brought against appellants to recover the value of a certain stock of shelf goods, groceries, merchandise, etc.; also show cases, fixtures, and other effects. Appellee’s cause of action was based on an alleged wrongful seizure under a writ of attachment issued out of the District Court of Rockwall County, Texas, on December 29, 1891, in a suit in which appellants were plaintiffs and one R. C. Garner defendant.
Appellee claimed the goods so seized and converted by appellants as trustee in a chattel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gunter v. Texas Land and Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
- Johnson v. J. M. Robinson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
- Watterman, Star & Co. v. SilberbergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Hudson v. C. Eisenmayer, Sr. Milling & Elevator Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Goldman v. SpannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915