Legal Opinion
Harris v. Tucker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 1931No. 19694PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Harris commenced this action against Tucker, Galt, and Marsh, to recoven’ damages for breach of an alleged agreement under which it was claimed he was authorized to sell a certain oil and gas mining lease.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to-plaintiff’s evidence and rendered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals, contending, under one assignment, error of the court in sustaining the demurrer.
The question is whether there- is any competent evidence tending to prove the allegations of plaintiff’s petition. Anatubby v. Bennington, 46 Okla. 2-21, 148 Pac. 828; Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oklahoma Hospital v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Nicholson Corporation v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Anoatubby v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Lavery v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James Energy Co. v. HCG Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Mershon v. EssleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Sheridan v. Deep Rock Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Roussel v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Pryor v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.