Commonwealth v. State Board of Physical Therapy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
This appeal tests the constitutionality of a statutory provision that prevents chiropractors from advertising that they perform “physical therapy.” The appellant chiropractors, Thomas A. Boch, Howard A. Bloom, Mark W. Bloom, and Ronald A. Cologna, and Weathervane Chiropractic, P.C., were charged with unlawful advertising under the Physical Therapy Practice Act (PT Act), 63 P.S. § 1304(a), (b.l). The charges were initiated by the Commonwealth’s Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs via an order to show cause why the State Board of Physical…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Adams Outdoor Adv., Lp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Smithfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Uniontown Newspapers, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- DePaul v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Kleese v. Pennsylvania State Board of Funeral DirectorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.