Legal Opinion
DePaul v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 30, 2009No. 194 EM 2007PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CASTILLE.
Petitioner, Peter DePaul, has filed a verified petition in the nature of a complaint seeking declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, challenging the constitutionality of Section 1513 of the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act, 4 Pa.C.S. § 1513 (“Gaming Act”).1 Section 1513 imposes upon a class of individuals affiliated with licensed gaming in Pennsylvania an absolute ban on political contributions to any candidate for public office in the Commonwealth, to any political party committee in the Commonwealth, or to any group or association…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Lscp, Lllp v. Courtney M. Kay-Decker, Director, Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. WaddellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Com. v. Arnold, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.