Legal Opinion
Santi v. Roxbury Town School District
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 27, 1996No. 96-093PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Plaintiffs, voters of the Town of Roxbury, seek an injunction to compel the Roxbury Town School District to hold a second reconsideration vote on the 1995 school budget. The Washington Superior Court held that a second reconsideration vote was not available to them. We affirm.
The town’s school budget was first voted by conventional ballot at town meeting on March 7,1995. The voters at the meeting approved the following question: “Shall the Roxbury Town School District vote a sum of money in the amount of $897,084.00 for current expenses of which $482,074.00 is to be raised from property…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Spring Brook Farm Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Buttolph v. OsbornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Denicore v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
- State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Stoddard v. GilmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bethel v. Mount Anthony Union High School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Couture v. Burlington Housing Authority (In Re Couture)District Court, D. Vermont · 1998
- Tucker v. BushwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In Re Milton Arrowhead MountainSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999