Legal Opinion

Anthony Flores v. Blake A. Hudson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2014No. 02A03-1307-PO-279Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. May 29 2014, 10:27 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVEN T. FULK, ESQ. NICHOLAS J. HURSH Fulk & Associates, LLC PAUL R. STURM Indianapolis, Indiana Shambaugh, Kast, Beck & Williams, LLP Fort Wayne, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA ANTHONY FLORES, ) ) Apellant-Defendant, ) ) vs. ) No. 02A03-1307-PO-279 ) BLAKE A. HUDSON, ) )…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A.S. v. T.H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Mysliwy v. MysliwyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Benefit Trust Life Insurance Co. v. WaggonerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Flash v. HoltsclawIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Garmene v. LeMastersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API