Legal Opinion

Flash v. Holtsclaw

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2003No. 49A04-0210-CV-480PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Rocky Flash (Flash) appeals the trial court's determination that he is in contempt of court for violating a protective order and also appeals the penalties imposed, the denial of his motion for a protective order against Susan Holtsclaw (Holtsclaw) and an order for the payment of attorney fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Issues

Flash purportedly raises six issues. We address those issues that are not waived, 1 which we consolidate and restate as four issues:

I. Whether the finding of contempt was proper;

II. Whether the orders for incarceration were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cowart v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Pitman v. PitmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Reed Sign Service, Inc. v. ReidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Carter v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marks v. TolliverIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re Paternity of MPMWIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Stuart Reed and Michael Reed v. Michael CassadyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Aaron v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. S.W. Ex Rel. Wesolowski v. KurticIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API