Legal Opinion

Balassy v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1986No. B017141PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, P. J.

This proceeding in mandate presents the question whether a trial court in an unlawful detainer action has jurisdiction to condition entry of judgment for lessee’s possession upon his immediate payment of pendente lite rents, when the lessor has failed to prove unlawful detainer.

As we explain in the following discussion, a trial court has no such jurisdiction.

The facts are simple and not in material dispute.1 After service of a 30-day statutory notice of termination of tenancy, landlord commenced an unlawful detainer action in municipal court based exclusively on the theory…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Balassy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API