In Re Loewenthal
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHurd, J.
The petitioner, Dr. M. Loewenthal, a practicing physician in the city of Cleveland, has invoked the original jurisdiction of this court for the purpose of obtaining a writ of habeas corpus to release him from arrest on a mittimus issued for contempt of a notary public because of his refusal to answer certain questions propounded to him during the course of a hearing by way of deposition in a case now pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County.
Involved is the question of privileged communications between physician and patient.
Since there is virtually no dispute as to the essential…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Munzer v. Swedish American LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Clifford v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Harpman v. Devine, Recr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Prince, Exrx. v. AbersoldOhio Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Medical Board v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DressOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Covington v. SawyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re RobertoOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Hollis v. FingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.