Legal Opinion

Prince, Exrx. v. Abersold

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1931No. 22459PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKinkade, J.

This is an action brought by two sisters, defendants in error here, against a third sister, as the executrix of the estate of a deceased sister, to recover the reasonable value of support, nursing, care, and maintenance given by the sisters bringing the action to the deceased sister. The defendants in error here, plaintiffs below, recovered in the trial court. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. The executrix prosecutes error to this court.

The facts as claimed by the defendants in error, many of which facts are denied by the' executrix, briefly and in general are as follows:

The…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1953
  2. Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. HumphrysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  3. Pink v. DempseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  4. Slover v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API