Legal Opinion

Soo Line Railroad v. Werner Enterprises

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 31, 2014No. Civil No. 12-1089(DSD/JSM)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the motion for summary judgment by defendant Werner Enterprises (Werner) and the motions to exclude expert testimony by Werner and by plaintiff Soo Line Railroad Company, doing business as Canadian Pacific (Canadian Pacific). Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court grants in part the motion for summary judgment and denies the motions to exclude expert testimony.

BACKGROUND

This property-damage dispute arises out of the March 31, 2012, collision between a truck…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Wegener v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  2. Fikre v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  3. American Dairy Queen Corporation v. W.B. Mason Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  4. Gilley v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
  5. Knox v. Impact MHC Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API