Legal Opinion
Fried, Mendelson & Co. v. Edmund Halstead, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 20, 1922PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
The action is to recover damages for a libelous publication set forth in the 4th paragraph of the complaint.
The 5th paragraph of the complaint is as follows:
“ Fifth. That the aforesaid publication was made to the plaintiffs agent and employee, in charge of receiving the mail, and who received the same, and upon information and belief was made to the defendant’s stenographer and representative and agent in the United States, and merchants in the United States and in England and others with whom plaintiff had been dealing and with whom he [it] had a good credit.”
The court deemed at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woodhouse v. New York Evening Post, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- People v. BihlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- People v. . BihlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Sidis v. FR Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Forman v. Mississippi Publishers Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943
- John Zuck v. Interstate Publishing Corp., John Zuck v. Marjorie Bair, Edward Purcell, Martin Goodman and Jean GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Hartmann v. Time, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.