Legal Opinion

Holsey Auto Sales v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 8, 1948No. Docket No. 12756Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Holsey Auto Sales, Inc. v. Commissioner.

Holsey Auto Sales v. Commissioner

Docket No. 12756.

United States Tax Court

1948 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 170; 7 T.C.M. (CCH) 351; T.C.M. (RIA) 48101;

June 8, 1948

Edward E. Burke, C.P.A., 921 Bergen Ave., Jersey City, N.J., for the petitioner. Jonas M. Smith, Esq., for the respondent.

OPPER

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

OPPER, Judge: By this proceeding petitioner seeks a redetermination of deficiencies for 1943 as follows:

Income Tax

$ 94.84

Declared Value Excess-Profits Tax

388.54

Excess-Profits Tax

3,732.92

The only question before us is petitioner's right to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haggar Co. v. Helvering, Com'r of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. J. E. Riley Investment Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Myrtle Avenue Corp. v. Mt. Prospect Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. Keystone Auto. Club Casualty Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
  5. Asbury Park & Ocean Grove Bank v. StonehamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API