Legal Opinion

Asbury Park & Ocean Grove Bank v. Stoneham

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 23, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, C. C. J.

This is a motion, in behalf of plaintiff to strike defendant’s answer on the ground that it is sham or frivolous. The suit is on a promissory note of the following tenor:

“Asbury Park, NT. J., Apr. 10, 1929. $14,500.

On demand, after date, I promise to pay to the order of G. P. Parmer Coal & Supply Co., fourteen thousand, five hundred 00/100 dollars, at the Asbury Park and Ocean Grove Bank of Asbury Park. Yalue received with interest.

No....... (Signed) Horace A. Stoneiiam.”

Endorsed:

G. P. Parmer Coal & Supply Company,

By Edward D. Parmer, Pres.

The defenses set up are that the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Altex Aluminum Supply Co. v. AsayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Holsey Auto Sales v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API