Legal Opinion
Pipas v. Syracuse Home Ass'n
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants’ motion to consolidate plaintiff’s actions against Syracuse Home Association and individual members of the staff of Syracuse Home Association (see, CPLR 602 [a]; Berman v Greenwood Vil. Community Dev., 156 AD2d 326, 326-327). Defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint also was properly granted. The tort causes of action, which relate to the retaliatory discharge, are barred by plaintiff’s election to assert a Labor Law § 740 cause of action (see, Labor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kern v. DePaul Mental Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kraus v. BrandstetterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Berman v. Greenwood Village Community Development, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ramsey v. H.M.S. Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reddington v. Staten Island University HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Pipia v. Nassau CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Bordan v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Deshpande v. TJH Medical Services, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rigle v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.