Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. H.M.S. Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint because the proposed cause of action is without merit (see, Wieder v Skala, 168 AD2d 355). Supreme Court also properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint because plaintiff failed to state a legally sufficient cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, prima facie tort, or wrongful discharge (see, Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp., 58 NY2d 293). Moreover, the submissions on the motion established that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Wieder v. SkalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Mansour v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pipas v. Syracuse Home Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API