Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Michigan Slate Co. v. Iron Range & Huron Bay Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Baraga. (Haire, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was commenced by attachment to recover against the defendant company the value of certain merchandise. Plaintiff claims under a written guaranty, signed by Milo Davis, chief engineer of the rail-. road company, as follows:

*15“Iron Range & Huron Bay R. R. Co.
“ Milo Davis, Chief Engineer and Superintendent of Construction.
“Arvon, Mich., May 23, 1891.

■“ Michigan Slate Company,

“Arvon.
“ Gentlemen: Please deliver to "Wallace Dingman such

supplies as he may order for the construction of the I. R. & H. B. R. R.,» until further notice, and the same will either be taken out of his estimate from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Adams Mining Co. v. SenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Calkins v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Bank of Middlebury v. Rutland & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cutter v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Durgin v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Marine Savings Bank v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Turner v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Conely v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API