Legal Opinion
Michele Steinberg v. United States Department of Justice
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 27, 1994No. 92-5436PublishedCited by 583 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court filed by Chief Judge MIKVA.
MIKVA, Chief Judge:
Before us is the adequacy of the responses of three subdivisions of the United States Department of Justice — the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts (“Boston USA’s Office”), FBI Headquarters, and the FBI’s Boston Field Office — to appellant Michele Steinberg’s request for documents under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). In granting summary judgment to the Department, the district court upheld the adequacy of the searches and the FBI’s redaction of a number of documents pursuant to several…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice, (Two Cases). Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States Department of Justice v. LandanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vaughn v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Harold Weisberg v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by583 opinions
- The Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau, and Max Holland v. United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Morley v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Border PatrolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- GUILLERMO FELIPE DUEÑAS ITURRALDE v. COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCYCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Baker & Hostetler LLP v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
578 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.