Legal Opinion

Commercial Inv. Trust Co. v. Minon

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 13, 1939No. 6914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit 'Judge.

On April 28, 1932, receivers in equity •were appointed for Marcus-Mayer Company by the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Thereafter Commercial investment Trust Company, the appellant, filed a petition seeking to reclaim twelve high speed automatic printing presses in the possession of the receivers. It alleged that the Miller Printing Machinery Company, its assignor, had delivered these machines to Marcus-Mayer Company under bailment lease agreements and that it was entitled to repossess them because of a default in payment of the rental due under…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Root v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Ott v. SweatmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Stiles v. SeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Edwards v. StranghellanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freedom Nat. Bank v. Northern Illinois Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Application of MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. Harry Cramer, Inc. v. Morris, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API