Legal Opinion

Madeline Cardenas v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2016No. 13-35957PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Circuit Judge:

A consular officer denied the visa application of Rolando Mora-Huerta, a Mexican national, on the ground that he was a “gang associate” who intended to enter the United States to engage in unlawful conduct. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(A)(ii). This suit, by Mora’s wife, Madeline Cardenas, a United States citizen, attacks the consular officer’s decision. The district court dismissed Cardenas’ complaint for failure to state a claim.

The critical issue on appeal is the standard of judicial review applicable to the visa denial. In Kleindienst v. Mandel, the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Jerrid Allen v. Kevin MilasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. International Refugee Assistance Project v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. Matushkina v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. State of Hawaii v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API