Barrow v. White
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, vacating an order appointing a guardian ad litem, and from an order dismissing the petition filed by said guardian ad litem, for the revocation of the probate of the will of Anna M. Hathaway, deceased. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Motion to dismiss the appeal. The last will and testament of Anna M. Hathaway was admitted to probate in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco in January, 1895, and thereafter, viz., June 21, 1895, upon his application therefor, Charles W. Barrow was appointed by one of the judges of said court guardian ad litem of Harriet Coleman Barrow, an incompetent person, claiming to be the heir at law of *271the deceased; and on the same day a petition was filed in said court in her name by her said guardian for the revocation of the probate of said will. Upon notice therefor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1888
- In re the Estate of SbarboroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Estate of Ohm v. JudgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Estate of MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by16 opinions
- Golin v. AllenbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Corotto v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Cunningham v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- In Re SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Foley v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.