Estate of Ohm v. Judge
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vancliee, C.
This is a proceeding in the probate department of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, on the petition of Susan E. Judge, based on sections 1589, 1590, and 1591 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and stating, substantially, that the deceased, in his lifetime, owned a large amount of valuable real estate, which was community property of himself and his wife, Augusta L. Ohm, and which he had conveyed to his wife, without consideration, for the purpose of defrauding his creditors, of whom the petitioner was one, in the sum of five thousand dollars; that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of KeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- In re the Estate of SbarboroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re the Estate of CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Estate of MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- In re the Estate of PotenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weiser Irrigation District v. Middle Valley Irrigating Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Estate of SchechtmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Barrow v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Gibson v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Cunningham v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.