Wayne Paul Burkett, K-8595 v. Thomas A. Fulcomer, Superintendent, Answering Blair County District Attorney. Wayne Paul Burkett
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
Once again the saturated dockets and the apparent strain on judicial resources in Blair County, Pennsylvania, give cause for us to examine whether a state prisoner’s constitutional rights to a speedy trial and due process of law have been violated by delays in post-conviction proceedings.1 Applying the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), to evaluate whether delays in the criminal justice system rise to the level of a constitutional deprivation, we find that the petitioner has…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Frank Howard v. Barbara Bouchard, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Commonwealth v. BurkettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.