Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the State Sales & Use Tax Liability of Townley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1987No. 15547Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

I respectfully dissent. This circuit court’s decision should be affirmed regarding (1) National’s fuel charges and (2) funds it retained from the sale of PAI. These proceeds fit within statutory exemptions in the South Dakota sales tax law.

The Department, and the majority of this Court, argue that National is in the business of renting ears, the gross receipts of which are subject to sales tax under SDCL 10-45-5. It is contended by the majority opinion that gross receipts are defined by SDCL 10-45-1(2) as the amount received in consideration of retail sales without deduction for any other…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In re the Termination of Parental Rights over D.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Board of Regents v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Application of VeithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API