Legal Opinion

Bovay v. Podolsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judg*844ment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of Scott Podolsky, M.D. (defendant) that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see, Grassi v Ulrich, 87 NY2d 954; Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744; Gailey Co. v Wahl, 262 AD2d 985). The testimony of plaintiffs medical expert supports the conclusion that medical care provided by defendant to plaintiff fell below the level of care acceptable in the professional community in which defendant practices (see, Schrempf v State of New York, 66 NY2d 289, 295; Kelly v State of New York, 259 AD2d 962),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Schrempf v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Grassi v. UlrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. F. K. Gailey Co. v. WahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. De Stefano v. ImmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API