Legal Opinion
Hursh v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 13, 2009No. WD 69285PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.
Renada Hursh appeals the judgment affirming the revocation of her driving privileges under section 577.041.5. 1 She claims that the finding that she refused to submit to a chemical test as required by section 577.041 is not supported by substantial evidence because, she says, the evidence shows that she tried to blow into the breathalyzer. The judgment is affirmed.
Facts
On November 1, 2007, at approximately 1:50 a.m., Officer Fidler stopped Hursh for a traffic violation. After Hursh failed field sobriety tests, the officer arrested Hursh for driving while…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Yamnitz v. Polytech, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hawk v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Baldridge v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Sweatt v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MignoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wei v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Allison v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Edwards v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Zahner v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.