Legal Opinion

Hawk v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1997No. 21177PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

The Director of Revenue (“Director”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court reinstating Clarence W. Hawk’s driving privileges. Hawk’s license had been revoked pursuant to § 577.041 for his alleged refusal to submit to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol concentration. We affirm the trial court’s judgment of reinstatement. 1

Director’s sole contention on appeal is that “the uncontroverted evidence reflects that [Hawk] refused to submit to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol concentration.” In a court-tried case, the judgment of the trial court will be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Reinert v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. S.D.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Borgen v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brown v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Duffy v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Peters v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Krieger v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Endsley v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API