Legal Opinion

Denton v. Wiese

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1956No. Civ. 5157PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This is an action to recover the reasonable and agreed value of work, labor, services performed and materials furnished by plaintiff to defendant, at his special instance and request, in the rebuilding of a sand plant owned and operated by the defendant Albert Wiese. Defendant Wiese in his answer alleged two affirmative defenses: (1) That he and the plaintiff entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to rebuild the sand plant for a sum certain and wrongfully refused to complete the rebuilding; and (2) That plain tiff acted as a contractor as defined in section 7026 of the Business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malvich v. RockwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Frugoli v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Dorsk v. SpivackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Powell v. BergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Briggs v. ZamalloaNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Borello v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Jackson v. PancakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Cargill v. AchzigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API