Legal Opinion

Derby v. Newton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is an action by plaintiff against defendants W. L. Newton and C. L. McCauley to recover damages for alleged conversion of an automobile. The case was tried before a court without a jury, and from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendants prosecute this appeal.

The only question presented, due to the failure to file a bill of exceptions, is whether or not the plaintiff’s pleadings are sufficient to sustain the judgment. According to the abstract of record, findings of fact in conformance with the allegations of the complaint were made by the trial judge, and filed, but they have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Miller v. HirschbergOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Austin v. VanderbiltOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. First Nat. Bank v. WegenerOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Hunt v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cross v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wallowa Law, Land & Abstract Co. v. McGaffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. St. Clair v. Jelinek Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Berry v. BLAIROregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. ELLIOTT ET UX v. TallmadgeOregon Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API