Town Pump v. DIST. CT. OF 18TH JUD. DIST., ETC.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
ORDER AND OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · SheehyJustice Sheehy
Application by relators for a writ of supervisory control. We accepted jurisdiction of the application, ordered briefs to be filed and now decide the issues without oral argument.
After fully considering the application, the supporting and opposing briefs, the applicable law and the facts in this case, we determine that the application for writ of supervisory control should be denied for the following reasons:
This application relates to cause no. 22478, now pending in the Eighteenth Judicial District, Gallatin County, entitled Stanley W. Ferguson et al. v. Town Pump, Inc.,…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Ferguson v. Town Pump, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Leavitt v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- Waite v. WaiteMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Stefonick v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1945
4Cited by8 opinions
- Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CamitschMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Zeke's Distributing Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Stanhope v. LawrenceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.