Legal Opinion
Wright v. Oregon Metallurgical Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 6, 2002No. CV 01-325-BRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BROWN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action against Defendants under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 as amended (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Plaintiffs are three participants in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP or the Plan) established by Defendant Oregon Metallurgical Corporation (Oremet).
This matter comes before the Court on three Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by the Oremet Defendants (# 74), Key Trust (# 69), and United Steelworkers of America Local 7150 (the Union)(#72). For the reasons that follow, the Court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lalonde v. Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re Sprint Corp. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- In Re Duke Energy ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
- In Re Syncor ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Lalonde v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.