Legal Opinion
Constantin v. McNeely
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1962No. 658PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
In compliance with the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:364, subd. E, requiring disposition of cases of this character within 24 hours after submission, we herewith hand down our decision, the reasons for which will follow in due course.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant.
Affirmed.
HOOD, Judge.
Plaintiff, Stanley Constantin, instituted this action under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:364 seeking a recount of all the boxes and all of the ballots (including ballots cast on the voting machines, absentee ballots and military ballots) cast in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. Democratic Executive CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- McConnell v. SalmonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Thornhill v. WearSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Hill v. Vernon Parish Democratic Executive CommitteeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Guillory v. Evangeline Parish Democratic Executive CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Champagne v. AckalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Angelle v. AngelleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Cusimano v. O'NiellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966