Legal Opinion

Cusimano v. O'Niell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1966No. 6860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Inasmuch as this matter involves an ■election contest which the law requires us to decide within twenty-four hours after submission, we shall hand down our judgment thereon today and give written reasons therefor in a few days.

We have carefully examined the record .and briefs and listened to the oral arguments advanced in this matter and find that plaintiff has laid a proper foundation for a recount of the absentee ballots cast in this ■election and are of the opinion that the trial judge properly found that twenty-two of the ballots were “spoiled” and invalid.

It is therefore ordered,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perez v. CognevichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Vidrine v. EldredSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Bradley v. NeillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. Courtney v. AbelsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. Hill v. Vernon Parish Democratic Executive CommitteeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGee v. FuselierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Angelle v. AngelleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API